Art veto
The Art and Islam exhibition, which is currently running at the Birmingham Museum & Art Gallery explores two artists’ impressions of Bangladesh, captured through textiles and photography. These impressions range from the materials remembered from a past visit, to the spiritual and industrial changes documented on a recent journey.
However, one of the artists - Syra Miah - is complaining over the fact that the gallery has removed an image of a semi-naked woman following a single complaint from the Muslim arts group Artists Circle.
The museum said it had acted on a complaint from a member of the Muslim arts group Artists Circle. Rita McLean, the museum’s acting head of museums and heritage projects, said in a statement: “The complaint we received was taken very seriously and it was after much consideration that the decision to remove the work from the exhibition was taken with the full agreement of the artist.” However, Ms Miah said she was not consulted and could have clarified the meaning and context of the image if asked.
An email about the decision from the museum’s Melissa Strauss to Ms Miah also said the work might hinder the institution’s attempts to increase its audiences. “The Art and Islam programme is about showcasing artists whose work is inspired by Muslim cultures in some way, but we are also aiming to reach new audiences through the programme,” she wrote. “This complaint has come from our target audience, and also a member of one of our main stakeholder groups.”
So “stakeholder groups” now get a veto on what can and can’t be shown?
According to the artist:
I felt that the whole message behind my show had been undermined by this censorship. During the editing process the curators seemed to want images in the exhibition that portrayed Bangladesh as another colourful Asian country. Sadly, the removal of this image, the only image in the show that could be interpreted as gritty, confirmed my growing cynical view that the museum wanted to perpetuate a myth about Muslim societies: that nudity isn’t tolerated. In Bangladeshi society - at least the one I witnessed - it clearly is.
The partially dressed figure in the image was actually a mentally ill woman who had made a home of a bus shelter. She was looked after by locals who made sure she was out of danger and fed. I think this shows a compassionate view of Islamic society.
Evidently, promoting a compassionate view of Islamic society is not in the remit of Artists Circle.
Monday 28 Aug 2006 | Paul | UK
The Artists Circle seem to have issued a statement regarding this: http://artistscircle.org.uk/statement.htm
From the statement: the gallery consulted Syra who understood and agreed for the work to be removed on the 18th of July.
huh?
I think the disclaimer is in the “As far as Artist’s Circle is aware”
According to Syra Miah, she was not consulted and could have clarified the meaning and context of the image if asked.